ZEE Entertainment and Essel Group : A Quest for Legacy and Beyond (A)
By Nandil Bhatia, Kavil Ramachandran
Harvard Business Publishing | November 2020
Harvard Business Publishing | November 2020
DOI
hbsp.harvard.edu/product/ISB237-PDF-ENG?Ntt=&itemFindingMethod=Search
Citation
Bhatia, Nandil., Ramachandran, Kavil. (2020). ZEE Entertainment and Essel Group : A Quest for Legacy and Beyond (A) Harvard Business Publishing hbsp.harvard.edu/product/ISB237-PDF-ENG?Ntt=&itemFindingMethod=Search.
Copyright
Harvard Business Publishing, 2020
Share:
Abstract
The case traces the entrepreneurial journey of Indian media baron Subhash Chandra. It starts with his entry into a struggling family business in 1967 and observes his evolution from a young, aspiring entrepreneur to the chairman of Essel Group, one of India’s largest business entities with interests in diversified sectors such as media, entertainment, education and infrastructure.
Chandra entered his family’s agricultural commodities business in 1967 when it was in dire straits and had lost all credibility in the market. Utilizing an opportunity to supply grains to the Indian Armed Forces, Chandra turned around the business shortly after entering it. In the 1970s and 80s, he forayed into entirely new sectors such as packaging and amusement parks. In 1991, he set up Zee Telefilms (later Zee Entertainment Limited) and launched Zee TV, India’s first non-public service television channel. By creating and broadcasting content in local Indian languages, Zee reached a wide audience of viewers across the country. Due to a first-mover advantage, Zee instantly became a huge success. Over the next three decades, Chandra relentlessly pursued new business opportunities in the media and entertainment industry, with considerable success. In 2018, Zee was a thriving enterprise, with a global viewership of 1.3 billion and business segments spanning broadcasting, music, film production, live events and digital over-the-top (OTT) media.
In 2007, to create a long-lasting legacy and diversify his personal wealth, Chandra entered the Indian infrastructure industry and bid for multiple projects in a short span of five years, winning several of them. However, unable to convert the infrastructure projects into profitable ventures due to unprofitable bids and execution mistakes, Chandra started to accumulate significant personal debt. His personal financial situation deteriorated to such an extent that he resorted to offering the shares of the listed companies he owned (including Zee) as collateral to banks to take additional debt to save his infrastructure business. The case ends with Chandra, and indeed his whole business empire, in a precarious situation due to indebtedness and facing some tough decisions.
The case, in its detailed account of Chandra’s business life, offers a first-hand experience of an entrepreneur’s journey from the origins of his fledgling firm to building and managing a successful business enterprise. The case will help students understand the process of entrepreneurship, value creation and business diversification and observe decisions around legacy and wealth creation that entrepreneurs and families at the helm of large businesses in India often face.
Chandra entered his family’s agricultural commodities business in 1967 when it was in dire straits and had lost all credibility in the market. Utilizing an opportunity to supply grains to the Indian Armed Forces, Chandra turned around the business shortly after entering it. In the 1970s and 80s, he forayed into entirely new sectors such as packaging and amusement parks. In 1991, he set up Zee Telefilms (later Zee Entertainment Limited) and launched Zee TV, India’s first non-public service television channel. By creating and broadcasting content in local Indian languages, Zee reached a wide audience of viewers across the country. Due to a first-mover advantage, Zee instantly became a huge success. Over the next three decades, Chandra relentlessly pursued new business opportunities in the media and entertainment industry, with considerable success. In 2018, Zee was a thriving enterprise, with a global viewership of 1.3 billion and business segments spanning broadcasting, music, film production, live events and digital over-the-top (OTT) media.
In 2007, to create a long-lasting legacy and diversify his personal wealth, Chandra entered the Indian infrastructure industry and bid for multiple projects in a short span of five years, winning several of them. However, unable to convert the infrastructure projects into profitable ventures due to unprofitable bids and execution mistakes, Chandra started to accumulate significant personal debt. His personal financial situation deteriorated to such an extent that he resorted to offering the shares of the listed companies he owned (including Zee) as collateral to banks to take additional debt to save his infrastructure business. The case ends with Chandra, and indeed his whole business empire, in a precarious situation due to indebtedness and facing some tough decisions.
The case, in its detailed account of Chandra’s business life, offers a first-hand experience of an entrepreneur’s journey from the origins of his fledgling firm to building and managing a successful business enterprise. The case will help students understand the process of entrepreneurship, value creation and business diversification and observe decisions around legacy and wealth creation that entrepreneurs and families at the helm of large businesses in India often face.